Canon PIXMA MX850 All-In-One: Probably a Great Printer, Horrible Scanner

Based on my previous all-in-one experience with the HP C7280, when I brought the Canon PIXMA MX850 home, the first thing I did after I installed it was to try out a scan. I didn't print, I didn't copy, I just scanned.

Freaking garbage.

Not as bad as the HP C7280, mind you, but still pretty bad. I tried a book cover and two different CD covers. All of them came out with horrible Moire patterns and pixel artifacts.

I never printed a single page (other than the printer head calibration). It's already in the box to be taken back.

I've learned something, but I'm not sure what.

  • Should I not trust all-in-one units because their scan capabilities will be mediocre at best compared to a dedicated scanner?
  • Should I not trust units with CIS scanners (as both the HP and Canon had) and look for something with a CCD scanner?
  • Should I not trust units that can attach over the network and/or USB? (Though the connection didn't matter when I tried it out both ways, so I doubt it's this one.)

Anyway, back to square one.

Print | posted @ Wednesday, April 23, 2008 7:53 PM

Comments on this entry:

Gravatar # re: Canon PIXMA MX850 All-In-One: Probably a Great Printer, Horrible Scanner
by Scott Hanselman at 5/8/2008 11:48 AM

That's surprising. I have the M550 and I love it. Did you check "descreen"? Magazines and 4color printing needed that checked or you'll get what you're describing.
Gravatar # re: Canon PIXMA MX850 All-In-One: Probably a Great Printer, Horrible Scanner
by Travis Illig at 5/12/2008 9:00 AM

Yup. Ugh. I can't tell you how long I spent checking and unchecking options, following the troubleshooting tips and trying different options. Ended up going for a separate printer and scanner rather than all-in-one.

Your comment:

Title:
Name:
Email:
Website:
 
Italic Underline Blockquote Hyperlink
 
 
Please add 5 and 6 and type the answer here: